Skip to main content

The 2017 Patsy Ratings: No. 7, Colgate

I had grown accustomed to the fanfare around the Patsy ratings.

I remembered that year when the Committee had Pitbull perform right by the pool, announcing the winner of that year's Patsies - the Colgate Red Raiders, he erroneously said (by then, they had rebranded to just "Raiders". )

The Walking Dead-colored mascot clad in Maroon embraced Pitbull as the fireworks exploded all around the pool.  The champagne flowed.  Caviar was consumed.  Shoe pastry was eaten.  "Colgate, we were born to be free," Pitbull ad-libbed.

What a difference compared to this year.

The Patsies came in a brown paper bag, thrown under the door of the Committee's offices.  Granted, the bag was thick - it appeared that they indeed did research, more so than the Pitbull years, it seems.  But the fanfare was gone.  All that was left were the numbers.


Here's The Beef
THE GOOD

Colgate is known for hauling in the beef every recruiting class - they like physical linemen and always seem to have a lot of offensive and defensive linemen that have a tendency to become all-Patriot League players.  This class is no exception: 7/21 of them, of 1/3 of the class, were either offensive or defensive linemen.

THE BAD

The original Patsy Rating on this class was much smaller, but one late, starred recruit, taped to a manila folder of a printout of an email, lifted the overall "quality point" total from "concerning" to simply "underwhelming".  That's not to say that the class is necessarily bad, by any stretch - just that, according to the recruiting services, there aren't a lot of starred recruits (and thus, not a lot of Patsy Points generated by the recruiting service "stars").

PATSY POINT CALCULATION
 
CLASS SIZE = 4.   Colgate's final size recruiting class was 21, which yields 4 Patsy points.

A note here on the word "Final."  In years past, the Committee decided to award Patsy Points almost as soon as the official recruiting classes came out.  This both was a blessing - the classes could be rated sooner, and a full offseason could be spent debating the results - and a curse.

The curse was that, inevitably, some All Patriot League player would drop to a team out of the sky after "Signing Day" had occurred.  Or a 4* recruit would ask nicely if they could instead walk on at Kentucky.  This would cause all the Patsy Points to need to be re-computed, and the classes re-ranked... and generally would make the Committee's job a massive headache.

"This is why," an illegible press release said later, "that we decided to move up the Patsy Point calculation days until the summer.  Take Colgate, who added two recruits after signing day that had an enormous impact on their Patsy Point total.  Even though it was more research work to hunt down the Twitter commitments (and in one case wait for the name to show up on the roster), we feel like it was worth it - barely."

QUALITY = 19.   Though 12/21 recruits generated quality points, it's worth of note that a very large percent of them came from one recruit.  That recruit was announced after Signing Day, and inflated this number immensely.

DISTRIBUTION = 8.  All positions except TE were covered in the class, so 8 out a 9 possible points were issued.

SPEED = 5.   Five recruits had speed information published on one or more of the recruiting websites, with three of them able to generate position points for the Raiders.

TRIGGER = 2.   Two quarterbacks were represented in the class, and both were recognized by a the recruiting websites, so two extra Patsy Points were issued.  (Since neither of them were starred recruits, however, this is one area of missed Patsy points that really hurt the Maroons.)

Typical Colgate Lineman
JUMBO = 3.  Of all the statistics, perhaps this was the most surprising - of the seven linemen in the incoming class, only three tipped the scales enough to generate Jumbo points.  In fact, for the first time in a long time, I didn't see any linemen on the Colgate incoming class list that tipped the scales at over 300 lbs.  Now, this could be explained by a desire to recruit lighter, faster linemen - but it's worthy of mention because in years past, this hasn't been the case.

NEEDS = 7 (of 12):  

OL = 2 (of 5).   The Maroons graduated a lot of linemen, so it seemed like this was Colgate's biggest need in the offseason.  Three linemen, none of them starred and only two that barely made "Jumbo Points", made this somewhat of a disappointing meeting of this need.

DB = 2 (of 4).   Similarly, it seemed like the Raiders needed to fill their roster with more defensive backs, but only got depth, not starred recruits.  (Some thought two out of four stars was excessively generous here.)

DL = 3 (of 3).   Of the need areas, this was clearly the best met.  4 recruits, including that late starred recruit, is exactly what the Raiders needed in this area, so they qualified for all the possibly points here.

COMMITTEE ADJUSTMENT: 

Though the class didn't look like a typical Colgate class, the grading of their incoming class seemed fair - no wacky outliers in terms of points or rankings.  That translated into no adjustment positive or negative.

COMMITTEE ADJUSTMENT: 0

COLGATE - 48

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League. W

UMass 21, Lafayette 14, halftime

Are you watching this game? UMass had this game under control until about 3 minutes in the second quarter, and then got an interception, converted for a TD. Then the Leopards forced a fumble off the return, and then converted THAT for a TD, making this a game. It's on CN8. You really should be watching this.

Examining A Figure Skating Rivalry: Tonya and Nancy

It must be very hard for a millennial to understand the fuss around the Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding figure skating scandal in the run-up to the 1994 Olympics. If you're of a certain age, though - whether you're a figure skating fan or not, and I am decidedly no fan of figure skating - the Shakespearean story of Harding and Kerrigan still engages, and still grabs peoples' attention, twenty years later. Why, though?  Why, twenty years later, in a sport I care little, does the story still grab me?  Why did I spend time out of my life watching dueling NBC and ESPN documentaries on the subject, and Google multiple stories about Jeff Gilooly , idiot "bodyguards", and the whole sordid affair? I think it's because the story, even twenty years later, is like opium. The addictive story, even now, has everything.  Everything.  The woman that fought for everything, perhaps crossing over to the dark side to get her chance at Olypic Gold, vs. the woman who