Skip to main content

Patsy Ratings - Colgate's Class of 2017

Next up in the Patsy ratings extravaganza is Colgate, who, as you'll see in a moment, seem to have not only embraced scholarship recruiting with the gusto The Bear attacks chicken wings, but also seem to have crafted an incoming class that seems, strangely, to almost be geared towards scoring Patsy Points.

The Committee, after seeing the numbers racked up by Colgate in this area, asked a question.  What is, actually, the highest Patsy Rating ever recorded?  Does this mega-class have what it takes to make it to the pantheon of Patsy Rating heroes?

The answer, surprisingly, is no.

In the limited number of years the Patsy Ratings have been running, there have been at least six classes with higher ratings than Colgate's fine class this season - and at least two classes that never enjoyed a Patriot League Championship, thus giving the rest of the league some hope.

It's no secret that Colgate brought in some good ones - but exactly how good is the class?


THE GOOD
If you're the type of person that looks at the number of stars next to your recruits and judge your entire recruiting class on that, you might as well stop looking at the other schools now.  The ratings agencies love the recruits signed by the Mean Red Machine, and as a result the Patsy Points piled up for Dick Biddle and company.  If Lafayette's class made you wonder "where are the scholarships?", Colgate's class might provide an answer.

THE BAD
There is a school of thought, in drafting, that you go for the "best athletes on the board" and don't take into account which areas of need you might have.  Is that what Colgate did here?  While Colgate's offensive juggernaut over the last couple of years has not been remotely a question mark in the last few years, the defense certainly has been, which reflects in the need areas for the Raiders.  Did Colgate shore up that side of the ball much?  It certainly doesn't seem like it when you look at the "needs" category.

QUALITY = 37. A stunning 15/21, or 71%, of Colgate's recruits were present in the major recruiting websites.  More importantly, though, 5 of them (about a quarter for those scoring at home) were 2 star recruits, and two of them "confirmed", meaning they were two star recruits from multiple agencies.  If scholarships can be cashed in for Patsy Points, the Mean Red Machine seems to have figured out the formula on how to do it.

CLASS SIZE = 3
.  21 Recruits.  One more athlete than Lafayette, and an overall class size that seems like it will be the norm with scholarship classes.

DISTRIBUTION = 8.  Every base was touched.

SPEED = 13. Speed information normally is not easy to come by, but that wasn't the case with Colgate's class, where seven different players provided Patsy Points for speed.

TRIGGER = 0.  Two QBs, neither rated.  To be fair, with senior QB Gavin McCarney and two sophomores returning next season, this didn't seem like a major need area for the Raiders.

JUMBO = 5. 4 OL and 5 DL.  3 out of the 4 OL meet the Jumbo criteria, while only 2 out of the 5 DL do.  This is one of the great debates of the Patsy ratings - what's more important, "jumbo", or "quality"?  If you look at "quality points", Colgate has Lafayette beat easily.  If you look at "jumbo points", Lafayette scores a narrow victory.

NEEDS = 7 (of 12):

DL = 3 (of 5): It's likely that future cultural anthropologists will look at this element of the Patsy ratings, and scratch their heads.  Why 3 out of 5 points?  Is there not a 2-star recruit there?  Yes, there is.  Are there not five recruits at this position, providing lots of potential depth in a "need area"?  Yes, there is.  But, the Committee counters, below the starred recruit, who is there?  Not enough, say the Ratings.

LB = 1 (of 4): Only two recruits, and neither were rated by any of the popular rating services.  The Committee was sorely tempted to put 0 here - and it makes you wonder, did the Raiders actually think of this as a need area?  Fans obviously disagree.

OL = 3 (of 3):
While - surprisingly - one of the 2-star recruits did not provide Jumbo points, a whopping 3 of the 4 recruits were of the starred variety, so it's not hard to fathom that this need was met with ease.

COMMITTEE ADJUSTMENT: 0.  The temptation for the Committee is to look at Colgate's rating points in terms of quality, and ask the question, really?  Are all the ratings services right?   Are they that much smarter than us?  Ultimately, though, the Committee, in a split decision, decided to not dock points since by any measure Colgate's star haul is a sight to behold.  And besides, it doesn't take a lot to prove that they are smarter than the Committee.  After all, they're not coming up with Patsy Ratings.

COLGATE - 73

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Water Cooler: Emma Watson, And Harvard Football

(Photo courtesy switched.com) I'm sure this won't be appreciated by the latest famous freshman to attend an Ivy League school. No, no, I'm not talking about Brooke Shields, I'm talking about Emma Watson, the actress who is best known for her turn as Hermione Granger in the Harry Potter movies. We always knew there was something, well, different about kids who went to Harvard - a bit of an upturned nose, perhaps, annoying arrogance, or maybe even some Brahmin-ness while we're at it. Turns out, though, that some students were up to something more sinister: stalking Ms. Brown University at the Harvard/Brown game last weekend, as reported by the New York Post : Page Six reported on Tuesday that the "Harry Potter" starlet and Brown University freshman looked "quite shaken" on Saturday as Harvard beat Brown 24-21 in Cambridge. Watson was reportedly flanked by security guards to protect her from gawkers. But her discomfort was actually the result

Assuming the Ivy Is Cancelling Out Of Conference Games, Here's How Patriot League Can Have 9 Game Season

The Patriot League could very well be in a huge bind assuming the Ivy League goes forward with their college football restart plans. According to Mark Blaudschun of TMG Sports, the Ivy League is considering two plans for their 2020 college football season - neither of which allow for any out of conference games. 13 out-of-conference games involving Patriot League teams would be on the chopping block, and when you add to it the Patriot League presidents' guidance to not fly to games , every single member of the Patriot League is affected.  If you add to that the fact that the opening of the college football season is going to at best start in late September (yes, you read that correctly), the Patriot League would count as one of the most deeply affected by Covid-19-influenced delays and decisions in the entire college football landscape. It is a bind to be sure - but not one that should see the Patriot League cancel the 2020 football season. If we start with the assumption that t

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League. W