Yeah, it would have been very, very easy to take one of a buffet of different words that describe what should be called from here on out as the "Mountain Meltdown". Take your pick, "Bad?" "Ugly?" "Stink?" "Disarray?" "Humiliate?" Taking one of those words and running with it would be way too easy, and talking through a nightmarish list of everything that happened on Saturday afternoon. But I'm not going to do that.
Instead, it's "emotion."
I keep going back to the words in the press conference after the Fordham loss from coach Coen, something I've mentioned over and over here. "The next two weeks will define who we are as a football team," he said. This week, with awful clarity, we see what football team this is. A team with no "emotion".
Coach Gilmore came out and said in the press conference, "I thought Lehigh was going to be a really emotional team with a league loss already. I stressed that point all week with our players that we would have to win that emotional [part of the] game."
What he didn't say is that Holy Cross seemed to win that part of the game before the opening snap. He could have, but he stopped himself short. He saw no need to pile on. The emotional state in this team is simply not right.
It's those type of emotional things, that maybe only are noticed by someone who is nuts enough to blog about Lehigh football may notice, come into greater clarity after this loss.
Like 2006 when the Lehigh team jumped on the Yale logo at halftime when they were getting their butts handed to them on the offensive and defensive lines. They did it again right before the Lafayette game as well in 2006, which handed coach Tavani a golden opportunity to become the master motivator he is. Tavani knows better than even coach Gilmore how to handle "emotion".
Both the Yale games and Lafayette games were losses. Both emotional outbursts of stomping on the logos were attempts by the team to show a bravado that "hey, we're Lehigh. We're faster than you, we're better than you, and you may as well not show up." It almost looks now, in retrospect, like a way to deny the reality - that we're no longer the best team out there. Yale's offensive line, they're good. Lafayette's offensive line, they're good.
Yale and Lafayette in 2006 were no longer buying into the "Lehigh mystique". The intimidation didn't work at all. Certainly not Lafayette, who thrashed us 49-27. I can't help thinking of the similarities between that game and the game this Saturday in the sense that going into both games, Lehigh had shown signs of playing good defense and playing good enough offense going into the game. But the defense was dissected, bit by painful bit. An exceptional quarterback found the open men, wide open, with nobody around them for big first downs.
For those that have been following Lehigh football as long as I have, they see the irony: the great teams in the late 1990s that went undefeated in the regular season didn't need to jump on logos to prove they were better. They would just get on the field and put the ball in the end zone. Their "emotion" was focused: Get on the field, shut up about it, and get it done.
And here, the season now resting in tatters, I see with clarity that the team felt the same way they did in 2006. And when I say team, I don't just mean the players, I also mean the coaching staff. They felt Lehigh was the most talented team out there. "We're Lehigh. We're going to get it all together, somehow, since we've got the faster players and the better players." It's as if Holy Cross was simply going to run away because we showed up.
We didn't need to work hard. We didn't need to go with any different gameplans that play better to our personnel strengths. We have great athletes. The other team is simply going to run away since we're always better than they are. "We're Lehigh."
Somewhere along the line, actually having dominating teams gave way to teams that simply fed off the legacy.
At no time did this 2007 team, even during the win against VMI, really earn that right to be called a dominating team in any phase of the game against anybody. This doesn't seem to be a team that has learned much of anything from the defeats in 2006 to the latest slide of three straight games.
Coach Gilmore, Holy Cross' head coach, must see the irony with clarity as well. He was on the coaching staff, next to coach Coen, coach Lembo, and head coach Kevin Higgins on those dominant Lehigh teams. Those teams did have "emotion", but it wasn't the "logo-jumping" kind of swagger. The emotion was focused into execution on the field of play. Coach Gilmore's current Crusader team shares that with the teams he was on at Lehigh.
It is that emotion which separates Holy Cross, who is in the hunt for their first-ever shot at the FCS playoffs (whether they win the Patriot League or not) and Lehigh, who is out of the hunt.
Coach Gilmore mentioned one other interesting thing from the press conference: that he "fully expects Lehigh to rebound and learn something from this, just like we would. It's a tough pill for them to swallow, but I know what the people here at Lehigh are all about, and I know they are going to respond in a positive way."
It is exactly how this coaching staff, and these players, respond to this beating that is the big question at this point. Coach Gilmore thinks that this staff will respond in a positive way. What I think is that this coaching staff needs to spend great, agonizing detail in getting in touch with "emotion". And it won't be easy.
Instead, it's "emotion."
I keep going back to the words in the press conference after the Fordham loss from coach Coen, something I've mentioned over and over here. "The next two weeks will define who we are as a football team," he said. This week, with awful clarity, we see what football team this is. A team with no "emotion".
Coach Gilmore came out and said in the press conference, "I thought Lehigh was going to be a really emotional team with a league loss already. I stressed that point all week with our players that we would have to win that emotional [part of the] game."
What he didn't say is that Holy Cross seemed to win that part of the game before the opening snap. He could have, but he stopped himself short. He saw no need to pile on. The emotional state in this team is simply not right.
It's those type of emotional things, that maybe only are noticed by someone who is nuts enough to blog about Lehigh football may notice, come into greater clarity after this loss.
Like 2006 when the Lehigh team jumped on the Yale logo at halftime when they were getting their butts handed to them on the offensive and defensive lines. They did it again right before the Lafayette game as well in 2006, which handed coach Tavani a golden opportunity to become the master motivator he is. Tavani knows better than even coach Gilmore how to handle "emotion".
Both the Yale games and Lafayette games were losses. Both emotional outbursts of stomping on the logos were attempts by the team to show a bravado that "hey, we're Lehigh. We're faster than you, we're better than you, and you may as well not show up." It almost looks now, in retrospect, like a way to deny the reality - that we're no longer the best team out there. Yale's offensive line, they're good. Lafayette's offensive line, they're good.
Yale and Lafayette in 2006 were no longer buying into the "Lehigh mystique". The intimidation didn't work at all. Certainly not Lafayette, who thrashed us 49-27. I can't help thinking of the similarities between that game and the game this Saturday in the sense that going into both games, Lehigh had shown signs of playing good defense and playing good enough offense going into the game. But the defense was dissected, bit by painful bit. An exceptional quarterback found the open men, wide open, with nobody around them for big first downs.
For those that have been following Lehigh football as long as I have, they see the irony: the great teams in the late 1990s that went undefeated in the regular season didn't need to jump on logos to prove they were better. They would just get on the field and put the ball in the end zone. Their "emotion" was focused: Get on the field, shut up about it, and get it done.
And here, the season now resting in tatters, I see with clarity that the team felt the same way they did in 2006. And when I say team, I don't just mean the players, I also mean the coaching staff. They felt Lehigh was the most talented team out there. "We're Lehigh. We're going to get it all together, somehow, since we've got the faster players and the better players." It's as if Holy Cross was simply going to run away because we showed up.
We didn't need to work hard. We didn't need to go with any different gameplans that play better to our personnel strengths. We have great athletes. The other team is simply going to run away since we're always better than they are. "We're Lehigh."
Somewhere along the line, actually having dominating teams gave way to teams that simply fed off the legacy.
At no time did this 2007 team, even during the win against VMI, really earn that right to be called a dominating team in any phase of the game against anybody. This doesn't seem to be a team that has learned much of anything from the defeats in 2006 to the latest slide of three straight games.
Coach Gilmore, Holy Cross' head coach, must see the irony with clarity as well. He was on the coaching staff, next to coach Coen, coach Lembo, and head coach Kevin Higgins on those dominant Lehigh teams. Those teams did have "emotion", but it wasn't the "logo-jumping" kind of swagger. The emotion was focused into execution on the field of play. Coach Gilmore's current Crusader team shares that with the teams he was on at Lehigh.
It is that emotion which separates Holy Cross, who is in the hunt for their first-ever shot at the FCS playoffs (whether they win the Patriot League or not) and Lehigh, who is out of the hunt.
Coach Gilmore mentioned one other interesting thing from the press conference: that he "fully expects Lehigh to rebound and learn something from this, just like we would. It's a tough pill for them to swallow, but I know what the people here at Lehigh are all about, and I know they are going to respond in a positive way."
It is exactly how this coaching staff, and these players, respond to this beating that is the big question at this point. Coach Gilmore thinks that this staff will respond in a positive way. What I think is that this coaching staff needs to spend great, agonizing detail in getting in touch with "emotion". And it won't be easy.
Comments
In my opinion, we need to attract and retain quality assistant coaches. I am confident that AD Sterrett is watching closely - If he was very disappointed with 8-3 records and losses to LC, what will he say if the team is 3-8 and loses to LC?
The players were listless and the coaches clueless. Nobody could be as bad as Lehigh looked Saturday.
Not up on LU recruiting . . . does anyone know how the last two years' recruiting ranked of the previous staff? Was the cupboard left bare ala Ty Willingham/Charlie Weiss?
This year's freshman class is entirely Andy's, and because of a late start, part of this sophomore class is his. The upper classmen were recruited by Lembo & Co., but remember, last year's team was an underachieving bunch that led the league in scoring average and only allowed 211 points (many coming vs. LC) Last year's team was loaded with players who dominated the PL all star squad so I can't buy any nonsense about Lembo leaving cupboard bare. One thing that I notice, especially when matched against the last three LC team -- Lehigh seems small especially along the lines. It looks from here as though better recruiting is needed from this point forward, since the entire PL is upgraded.
Having said all of that - there is absolutely no excuse for that debacle Saturday. How do you come out flat under the circumstances? How can players just let down so completely, as this team seemed to do Saturday? The focus needs to be on these coaches; I expect a rout of Gtown this Saturday...a game in which emotion is shown, the offense gets their head out of their Asses and the defense plays with intensity and pride. Otherwise, Andy will be the answer to a trivia question.