Skip to main content

Revolutionary Thinking to Save the CAA


In every place in America that I've lived, there's been evidence of the times of the American revolutionary war.

Close by, in some form or another, I've been amongst 18th-century farmhouses and ancient taverns where George Washingon, Ben Franklin or John Adams might have sipped madeira or stayed the night.

I've visited 12 of the original 13 colonies (South Carolina is the only one that has evaded me). I've been to Boston, the epicenter of civil disobedience against the British, and live near Philadelphia, where the founding fathers made a functioning government amidst the chaos around them that still, to this day, serves as an example worldwide.

The theme of revolution seems to be apropos to the collegiate realignment maelstrom that continues to swirl through collegiate athletics as we speak, making ridiculous ideas like Boise State in the Big East and Pitt in the ACC seem somewhat justifiable in the face of all logic.

In such an environment, could there be a way to protect Eastern scholarship programs from the gale?

If there is, it will require out-of-the-box thinking and consideration of ideas that once seemed foolish.  In short, it requires revolutionary thinking - and, perhaps, even a new conference alliance.


Lately, I've been imagining the situations some of those English farmers as the actions of the British became ever more punitive and more destrictive.

Did they try to concentrate on their crops, willfully denying the chaos around them?  Did they take up arms?  Did they declare their loyalties to the British or the Revolutions?  Or did they become politically active in trying to create solutions?

Probably, in reality, some combination of all of these motivated those colonial farmers during this time.

While there's a whole lot less at stake in collegiate athletics realignment than the founding of a new nation, the current NCAA landscape certainly is chaotic, especially in terms of Eastern FCS football.

Over the course of a six-week period, Old Dominion went from being completely comfortable in the Colonial Athletic Association to joining Conference USA and upgrading their program to FBS, a move that has shaken the CAA to its core.

That comes in conjunction with the long-awaited transition of Rhode Island to NEC-level football coming in 2013, UMass leaving the CAA to play FBS football in the MAC this year, and Georgia State departing this season to play low-level FBS ball in the Sun Belt.

(At least this time around there haven't been any CAA programs that have unexpectedly dropped football, like Hofstra and Northeastern did in 2009.)

Even with all this change, does that mean on the football side, the CAA is in trouble? Hardly.

The remaining eight members include four recent FCS national champions in Delaware, Villanova, Richmond and James Madison, and the other four have all been in the playoffs in the past decade.  Competitvely, there's no question about the solidity of the eight programs there now.

But clearly, in this landscape, there is strength in numbers. It seems that you can wake up one day and see, thanks to "industry sources", see three of your teams rumored to depart.

The CAA continues to be in a good position now for the very reason that they had a large inventory of teams and could survive a raid.

It was my observation of the situation in the CAA that finally made me realize that my thinking about the collegiate conference landscape had to change - that I couldn't work on my crops in denial anymore.

I've been on the record before as saying that 12, 14, or 16-team "mega-conferences", especially at the FCS level, made no sense, since there can be no championship game if those conferences wish to participate in the playoffs.

In my opinion, there is still nothing more anticlimactic than determining a conference champion via a tiebreaker, and in large conferences it's a virtual certainty that this would be the case.

But with the new uncertainty around college athletics, maybe it's time to think in a new way about things - something revolutionary.

What if Tom Yeager, the commissioner of the CAA, and Carolyn Schlie Femovich, the executive director of the Patriot League, formed a football alliance?

(To continue reading, click this link at the College Sports Journal.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven Positive Thoughts About All the Patriot League Recruiting Classes

It's recruiting season.  Every incoming recruit is a Patriot League all-star, everyone is a first team all-American, everyone is undefeated.  It's all good times, a chance for kids to be admitted to some of the best Universities in the world.  In that, it's a win for everyone.

While we wait for each of the remaining recruits to be announced as a part of their recruiting classes, I thought I'd comb through all of the incoming classes of the Patriot League and tell you what sticks out to me.

This summart isn't a ratings-based system, than folks like 247Sports have in terms of measuring the number of "starred recruits" (they list Holy Cross as the "winner"), or even a hybrid-based system, like LFN's yearly Patsy Ratings (last seasons "winner": Lehigh) or HERO Sports' list of the top overall FCS recruits (which lists Lafayette as the "winner").  It's just one guy, looking at the recruit lists, and giving his opinion.

What Are You Doing the Night of Lehigh's 2017 Home Opener?

I have this vision.

It's the weekend of the home opener at Murray Goodman Stadium, Labor Day weekend.  It could be a Thursday, Friday, or Saturday.

And it's 6:00 PM.

In 2018, the Lehigh football team will open the season with a big celebration of the football program - at Navy, Lehigh's first game against an FBS team in over a decade.

In 2017, why not, as a one-off opportunity, try to have one Lehigh football game, the home opener, be the first-ever night game at Murray Goodman Stadium?

Will it cost money?  Yes.  Will it be easy?  Probably not.

However, is it doable?  I've got to believe the answer is "yes".


Sandusky/Paterno Timeline Keeps Getting More Difficult To Ignore

The crimes committed by Gerald Sandusky continue to be a band-aid that is re-applied, and continuously ripped off, the arms of those of love Penn State.

Already convicted by a court of law, Sandusky has what is effectively a life sentence, while others who were in power at Penn State during the 1998 period where sex crimes were reported internally, Graham Spanier, Gary Schulz and Tim Curley, have still not faced any sort of trial and are still at-large today.

Last week, with an interesting sentence appearing deep in an insurance lawsuit involving a Sandusky victim settlement, the band-aid was once again ripped off.

The details of the lawsuit claim that Joe Paterno chose not to act in 1976 when one victim reported abuse by Sandusky, while Sarah Ganim, the hero reporter who broke the Sandusky story wide-open five years ago, added a second story of abuse in the 1970s where Paterno pressured one of Sandusky's victims over the phone in the 1971 to not press charges against him.

Penn S…