Skip to main content

Two Minute Solutions: Steroids In Baseball

In the first of my "Two Minute Solutions" series to the aggravatingly complex problems in pro sports today, I feel compelled to weigh in on the steroid allegations dogging Roger Clemens and hundreds of other major league baseball players.

There's been lots of ink spilled since the Mitchell report connected the dots. "The Rocket" has been issuing not very convincing denials of his use of HGH and steroids as far back as 1998, attempting to distance himself from his former trainer Brian McNamee who allegedly injected him with steroids and HGH. Aside from not passing the "smell test", this slow-motion disintegration of Clemens' and baseball's legacy is not only shameful, it ruins baseball.

Similarly, Bonds' farce of a "victory tour" in the shadow of his own HGH allegations have made a mockery of America's pastime. The debate instead because "should we could the steroid era records the same as the real baseball records?"

People may still go back and watch and follow baseball after the Mitchell report. But through history the "athletes" of this generation - my generation - will always be tainted by the "did he or didn't he". An entire generation has been shown for suckers. We bought tickets to the games, collected the baseball cards, reveled in the records, put life-size posters in our rooms. And it's all a fraud.

For our generation, it is too late. Baseball has been one giant fraud from the mid-1980s to today. But there is some very small hope that for my son's generation, the sport can be saved from WWF-like freaks.

This is why Bud Selig - known for being a feckless, toothless commissioner - needs to ban Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds from baseball now.

Sometimes, you have to put people up as examples. Banning both from baseball would send the powerful message that the court of public opinion doesn't matter, the players' union, and the lawyers don't matter - sometimes, like in the Pete Rose situation, you have to simply ban a player to show people that you simply can't get away with cheating.

Folks say there's not enough evidence - they say McNamee is somehow lying about Roger Clemens, but was telling the truth about Pettite and countless others in the Mitchell report. They split hairs about Bonds, saying there is not enough evidence that he "knew" the cream would make his head one and a half times bigger - yet a book exhaustively details BALCO and the products Bonds took.

A house subcommittee is going to weigh in on this in February. But Selig doesn't even need to wait for that. Doesn't Selig know all he needs to do is issue this statement, and there's no need for congressional meetings and he is seen as the savior of baseball?

"I've looked over all the evidence, and I have decided to ban Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds for the good of major league baseball. Their presence in the sport is slowly killing it like so much arsenic. By banning them, it should send a powerful message to new and existing players alike: if you choose to run with McNamee and BALCO, be prepared to pay the consequences. Steroids and HGH have no place in baseball, and I condemn anyone who uses them or who ever used them."

Comments

Travis said…
While I dislike Bonds and am just pissed at Clemens, neither broke rules that were in place in MLB when they reporedly took the substances.

For that reason alone they shouldnt be banned.
Anonymous said…
why dont you stop talking about baseball and other stuff people don't come here to talk about and show some love to the football guys who were named all-americans. i guess that would make too much sense
Anonymous said…
Dr. Joan Neff is the lady whom we found in the photo. She contributed her beginning and end vitality for the help of the all-inclusive community and this time she made here stride for their family. Since she appeared her working and find the best way to deal with do work.

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Water Cooler: Emma Watson, And Harvard Football

(Photo courtesy switched.com) I'm sure this won't be appreciated by the latest famous freshman to attend an Ivy League school. No, no, I'm not talking about Brooke Shields, I'm talking about Emma Watson, the actress who is best known for her turn as Hermione Granger in the Harry Potter movies. We always knew there was something, well, different about kids who went to Harvard - a bit of an upturned nose, perhaps, annoying arrogance, or maybe even some Brahmin-ness while we're at it. Turns out, though, that some students were up to something more sinister: stalking Ms. Brown University at the Harvard/Brown game last weekend, as reported by the New York Post : Page Six reported on Tuesday that the "Harry Potter" starlet and Brown University freshman looked "quite shaken" on Saturday as Harvard beat Brown 24-21 in Cambridge. Watson was reportedly flanked by security guards to protect her from gawkers. But her discomfort was actually the result

Assuming the Ivy Is Cancelling Out Of Conference Games, Here's How Patriot League Can Have 9 Game Season

The Patriot League could very well be in a huge bind assuming the Ivy League goes forward with their college football restart plans. According to Mark Blaudschun of TMG Sports, the Ivy League is considering two plans for their 2020 college football season - neither of which allow for any out of conference games. 13 out-of-conference games involving Patriot League teams would be on the chopping block, and when you add to it the Patriot League presidents' guidance to not fly to games , every single member of the Patriot League is affected.  If you add to that the fact that the opening of the college football season is going to at best start in late September (yes, you read that correctly), the Patriot League would count as one of the most deeply affected by Covid-19-influenced delays and decisions in the entire college football landscape. It is a bind to be sure - but not one that should see the Patriot League cancel the 2020 football season. If we start with the assumption that t

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League. W