Skip to main content

Bill Simmons "Saves" Holy Cross

I think this will have to be done as an open letter to Mr. Simmons. Basically, for those of you that follow Holy Cross' famous sportswriting alumnus Bill Simmons, yesterday he posted an attempt at humor that pretty much insulted not only his alma mater, but anyone who feels passionately about Patriot League sports. (He also mentioned Holy Cross in his basketball blog that was equally as damaging.)

In a nutshell, Mr. Simmons' thesis (you know I'm worked up when I call him Mr. Simmons) is that Holy Cross basketball "has a degree of difficulty every season" that isn't necessary, and (with tongue-in-cheek) makes some "suggestions" to improve the program. Some of his suggestions include NCAA violations ("I want to be a booster. I want to break rules. I want to make a difference."), getting a coach which looks the other way during recruiting violations ("Replace Willard with a disgraced coach looking for a second chance, someone who doesn't mind bending a rule or 10 to get the program humming.") and other such hilarity.

To top it off, he has some choice words for the Patriot League itself, calling it "No-Man's Land" and "a homeless man's version of the Ivy League", and mock-suggesting that Holy Cross should join the NESCAC of Division III since it's "what it's so desperately trying to become."

A lot of folks on the CrossSports board have weighed in, as well as HoopTime. It hasn't been pretty. Now it's my turn.

Bill,
You really had me fooled.

As a fellow Red Sox fan and '92 graduate of a Patriot League school, I thought you'd be a different type of sportswriter. I read your book, Now I Can Die In Peace, and found myself smiling, and kicking myself. How did I not know about this guy sooner? An unapologetic Red Sox fan - and Patriot League alumnus? You echoed what all Red Sox fans felt at that time - the us-versus-them mentality. There was an element of rooting for the underdog. Even in your writeup of the Patriots' Super Bowl win it's there.

I had seen this perspective slip in the past year. I'd forgiven you when you said you forgave the Red Sox for spending like, well, the Yankees after watching D-Mat pitch. I'd forgiven you for saying that we all should love the eminently non-lovable Patriots. I even forgave you for having man-crushes on Kevin Durant and Greg Oden, even though I have serious doubts that either kid has taken a single class at Texas or Ohio State.

But I have to say stop when slamming Holy Cross and the Patriot League.

I have no problem about trying to be funny or sarcastic. (This probably makes sense from me, who once suggested that Columbia football start a unique promotion involving sky blue Jello in order to boost attendance.) But in all honesty after reading the column twice, I'm not clear whether you're serious or you're joking. I have to ask: Do you really think it's OK to get players in there who can barely hack it academically and hire a coach to (basically) cheat their way in order to become "the Gonzaga of the East"?

If you honestly believe that, my friend, then you have truly gone to the dark side. It's no longer about doing things pretty much the right way and winning. It's then all about winning at any cost, monetarily or ethically. Basically, you've just become another voice of darkness, another John Calipari in world where there are too few Ralph Willards.

Is this what it's about? UMass envy? Because your "solution" for Holy Cross basketball looks an awful lot like the crap UMass tried to pull in the Calipari era. Would you rather have gotten the aloof, conceited, Darth Vader-like Calipari from Pittsburgh instead of Willard as the Crusader head coach? Would you rather Marcus Camby have got into Holy Cross? Watch him get busted for accepting money from agents and possessing marijuana? See a Final Four appearance get vacated due to NCAA violations? See Calipari escape to the New Jersey Nets at the first sniff of trouble, leaving a wake of NCAA probation that UMass has struggled to shake ever since?

The Patriot League has not done everything right in its twenty years in existence. They took too long to go to scholarship basketball. They let some golden opportunities go for membership and athletic competitiveness. But they have been getting more things right than wrong, especially lately. Bucknell and Holy Cross have shown the Patriot League what a scholarship league can be - with real students who actually take challenging classes, and athletes who actually have a chance to make something of their lives, not playing for some chance to play in Clermont-Ferrand in central France. There's no reason why Bucknell and Holy Cross can't be a Southern Illinois or Butler in the world of college basketball, but with students that are in the top 5% academically.

But Bill, you've lost that. Incredibly, you had it once when rooting for the Red Sox. Now you're all A-Rod and no Sam Horn. All Maurice Clarett and no Gil Fennerty. To you, it's all about money and winning and the NBA - and you've completely lost the point. If you were cast in a sports movie, you'd be Tom Arnold.

You're lost in a world before you were born, where Holy Cross could graduate a 6'7 power forward and a 6'1 point guard that could become NBA hall-of-famers. You say that Heinsohn and Cousy are pissed because Holy Cross lost to Southern Illinois. I say that if Heinsohn and Cousy played today, it would still probably be Southern Illinois 61, Holy Cross 51. Times have changed. The game has changed. Everyone is more athletic. And the Patriot League is not there yet, but it's getting there - which is more than most conferences can say. (Ask the MAAC, for example.) Maybe if you watched more than one Patriot League game a year, you'd see that things are getting better. That's not being a "soccer mom", as you've intimated in your column - that's called watching Patriot League basketball games.

How could we have graduated the same year, from Patriot League schools, and come to such opposite conclusions? Granted, Holy Cross lost a lot athletically when it joined the Patriot League, and all the teams in the Patriot League floundered at first when the league tried to over-apply theory to the facts of collegiate athletics. But even you have to admit it's better now for Holy Cross than it was ten or fifteen years ago. Those debates on whether Holy Cross should really join the NESCAC are really over, and have been for years. (The final bell tolled when Arthur Rothkopf retired last year as Lafayette president.)

Do you love teams being made in the right way, with the right guys, with the right coaches? Do you love teams that can beat Big 12, SEC, Big East and A-10 teams? Do you love underdogs that will work harder and play better than these over-talented yet under-brain-powered teams? Then the Patriot League is for you. On the other hand, if you've completely lost it (as I suspect you have), please, by all means, claim you went to UMass instead. Root for Marcus Camby. Root for Memphis to make the Final Four, and by all means don't be sad when Calipari gets tagged again for NCAA violations and shows up as the next coach of the Denver Nuggets. After all, it's only about winning basketball games, even if you're cheating, right?

Just please don't claim that you are, or ever were, a fan of a Patriot League school.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I am giving you a standing ovation right now.
DFW HOYA said…
The fact of the matter is that Holy Cross is the only PL school which had a significant national basketball tradition, and ever since 1979 (when it turned down the Big East) it has been on the outside looking in.

Popular posts from this blog

How To Get Lehigh Fans To Games, And Keep Them There?

You don't have to have attended more than twenty-five years of Lehigh football games to know it's a completely different world out there for your friendly neighborhood sports fan.

When Lehigh's Murray Goodman Stadium was opened in 1988, there were only about a dozen channels on the small, eighteen inch black and white TV we had in our dorm room.  Only two channels might have had "major college football" games on at the same time a Lehigh football game was being played live over the mountain.  (Notre Dame, the only school who had all their games televised, almost always played their games at 3:30 PM.)

Nowadays there's way more entertainment options on a typical college weekend than ever, and it's very logical to think that the increased amount of competition might not just keep students away from attending football games, but local fans as well.

It's not an issue confined to Lehigh - in 2014, home attendance at all FBS games dropped to their lowest le…

Fifteen Guys Who Might be Lehigh's Next Football Coach (and Five More)

If you've been following my Twitter account, you might have caught some "possibilities" as Lehigh's next head football coach like Lou Holtz, Brett Favre and Bo Pelini.  The chance that any of those three guys actually are offered and accept the Lehigh head coaching position are somewhere between zero and zero.  (The full list of my Twitter "possibilities" are all on this thread on the Lehigh Sports Forum.)

However the actual Lehigh head football coaching search is well underway, with real names and real possibilities.

I've come up with a list of fifteen possible names, some which I've heard whispered as candidates, others which might be good fits at Lehigh for a variety of reasons.

UPDATE: I have found five more names of possible head coaches that I am adding to this list below.

Who are the twenty people?  Here they are, in alphabetical order.

Trump's Disinvitation of the Eagles Commits the Cardinal Sin against Philadelphia - Slighting Them

Monday evening, less than 24 hours before they were scheduled to visit the White House, Trump "disinvited" the Super Bowl Champion Eagles from coming.

The "reasoning" for disinviting the Eagles - if you can call it that - was included in a statement released by the White House.

"They disagree with their President because he insists that they proudly (sic) stand for the National Anthem, hand on heart (sic), in honor of the great men and women of out military and the people of our country," it reads, conveniently ignoring the fact that no Philadelphia Eagles kneeled during the National Anthem during the course of the entire season.

I don't think Trump fully comprehends what he has done.

Certainly Trump probably thinks he is speaking to his "base" - the people Trump thinks voted for him in 2016, and people who think will continue to vote for him and his preferred candidates in the future.

But Trump's bottomless bad faith in "disinviti…