Skip to main content

Sunday's Word: Close

This word may come as a surprise. Originally I thought it was going to be: "Playmakers", since it didn't feel like there were enough of them, especially on defense last weekend against Harvard when the chips were down. But it's not time for backbiting as we hit the first REALLY important game of the season. It's time for a reality check.

September is done. What do we have here for Lehigh football in 2006? We have a team that is "close", but 1-3. We've had a team that's made critical mistakes (and no phase of the game has been immune). We've had "coulda, woulda, shoulda".

We are a team that has played four awfully good football teams. We've found a way to come from behind and win one football game against a tough Villanova squad, but could not find a way to come back and win against three teams that either are in the I-AA Top 25 or close to it. None of these games have been blowouts. In none of these games can you say, "Lehigh was clearly outclassed on both sides of the ball."

I hear folks saying, "Well, yeah, but we're 1-3". It's true, we are. But even though it's an old saw, we're "close" to being 4-0.

In truth, this is not unique to 2006. Does anyone remember last year? Lehigh 28, VMI 26? Lehigh 28, Yale 21? Against VMI, we needed a huge interception as VMI was closing in on FG range to seal the win. Against Yale, we had to rally to tie and then go ahead. And I don't need to mention losses to Holy Cross, Delaware, and that Easton school. Fact is, there were a lot of times last year when we didn't put the hammer down. It cost us in some key ball games, and almost cost us in a couple others.

In ways, this year is more of a continuation of 2005's trend than any new specific difference in 2006. We're still playing too many "close" games. When you do, you're going to get some character-building wins, but you're not going to win them all. Once in a while, you have to put the hammer down.

We've got a team that is pretty "close". "Close" to the coaching staff by all accounts, "close" to being 4-0, "close" to being a team nobody wants to face in the Patriot League. It's not time for a major overhaul. It's time to rally behind the team as we face the most critical games on the schedule. But looking objectively, we've got a very talented team that still seems like it's ready to break out at any moment and do well the rest of the way.

Does anyone actually beleive that we're not going to have an excellent shot at the Patriot League title? Yeah, it's been a rough September. But can we say that Lafayette, Colgate and Holy Cross have really acquitted themselves much better? Let's analyze their out-of conference wins. Marist, Dartmouth, and freakin' Sacred Heart - that's it. Lafayette is 0-3 versus Penn, Princeton, and Yale. Colgate lost to UMass and Monmouth. Holy Cross lost to Northeastern and Harvard.

The difference is that these three teams have proven themselves against Bucknell, Fordham and Georgetown in Patriot League games. And all three have, bringing the hammer down. Colgate 31, G-Town 14. Lafayette 31, Bucknell 0. Holy Cross 26, G-Town 13. Holy Cross 28, Fordham 21.

I still believe that we have an excellent chance to win the Patriot League title. But we've got to stop playing so many "close" games and put the hammer down. If we put the hammer down against Georgetown, then we'll be in the same place as Holy Cross, Lafayette and Colgate. In 2006, that's not a bad place to be.

I can't speak for everyone, but I beleive in coach Coen and I beleieve in these players. Please feel free to jump off the bandwagon if you'd like, but I think as long as they trust coach Coen's system, learn the lessons of September, work hard, and put the hammer down whenever the opportunity is given to them - this team will win games and compete for championships.

I'll be looking for a "hammer" next Saturday.

Comments

Chase's Dad said…
You are dreaming if you think that Lehigh is going to win the PL title. Yes, that would be so great, and I would gladly make the trip to any playoff games, but you said it yourself. Lehigh can only handle one solid half of football, and the last time that I checked, the NCAA still mandates two halfs for an entire game. Yeah, Holy Cross, and Colgate, and the Laugh, are bad too, but they play consistant ball all game long. Lehigh doesn't. This is a rebuilding year, and we need to accept it as such.

While I am on the subject, we need a quarterback, not a running back that can throw well.
Anonymous said…
Chuck:

It's "believe", not "beleive". I before E except after C.

That's OK. My nemisis word is "separate."
Anonymous said…
BRING BACK THE BIG LEMBOSKI!
Anonymous said…
Being outside of the region, it is hard for me to get a good sense of what the other PL teams are looking like but from what I saw of Lehigh on Saturday they aren't that far away right now. I was very impressed with the way the front seven played. I thought they handled the run extremely well and were able to get consistent pressure. The secondary needs to do a better job of limiting YAC and then you won't see all of those 3rd down conversions.

I was impressed with the Coen offense. I thought the plays were well designed and imaginative. When the players execute, they score points but when they don't you see things like the botched option-reverse in the first quarter.

All in all I think that Lehigh is in decent shape as they get into the PL schedule.
Anonymous said…
woah lets not bail on Sedale. Im a big bliever in him. He is lehigh's present and future since he is a junior. With some more time and game exprience i think he will be one of the best quarterbacks lehigh has seen in years. Lehigh's defense has way more question marks than its offense. What do you guys expect the offense to score, 50 points a game? That 24-7 lead should of been enough. Our offense shouldnt of needed to score another point. Coen better work on the defense, beacuse defense wins championships.

Popular posts from this blog

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League. W

UMass 21, Lafayette 14, halftime

Are you watching this game? UMass had this game under control until about 3 minutes in the second quarter, and then got an interception, converted for a TD. Then the Leopards forced a fumble off the return, and then converted THAT for a TD, making this a game. It's on CN8. You really should be watching this.

Examining A Figure Skating Rivalry: Tonya and Nancy

It must be very hard for a millennial to understand the fuss around the Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding figure skating scandal in the run-up to the 1994 Olympics. If you're of a certain age, though - whether you're a figure skating fan or not, and I am decidedly no fan of figure skating - the Shakespearean story of Harding and Kerrigan still engages, and still grabs peoples' attention, twenty years later. Why, though?  Why, twenty years later, in a sport I care little, does the story still grab me?  Why did I spend time out of my life watching dueling NBC and ESPN documentaries on the subject, and Google multiple stories about Jeff Gilooly , idiot "bodyguards", and the whole sordid affair? I think it's because the story, even twenty years later, is like opium. The addictive story, even now, has everything.  Everything.  The woman that fought for everything, perhaps crossing over to the dark side to get her chance at Olypic Gold, vs. the woman who