Skip to main content

Sunday's Word: Aristotle

So here I am, trying to come up with a word on this week in Lehigh football, and I stumble upon David Brooks' NY Times editorial about the Mets. It was pretty serendipitous, as I could care less about the Mets and the World Series in general (well, now that my beloved Red Sox stunk up the joint in August and September, and the Yankees were happily humiliated against the Tigers). But Mr. Brooks did have a quote from Arisotle that I thought was worth repeating.

"As Aristotle says, the more one is possessed of excellence, the more one will be pained at the thought of elimination."

After reading this, I realized that I had found the sentence that perfectly describes the angst of the Lehigh fan not just this year, but for all time. We, as Lehigh fans, know we have good, talented teams. But the pain of losses, the potential of losing the Patriot League title again this year, despite our obvious talent, is real. Aristotle, man. He put all of our angst into one easy-to-remember sentence.

We look at the Georgetown game and, rightly or wrongly, see our Mountain Hawks as a team that is "possessed with excellence" and should have been destroying them. We've got Sedale. Good running backs. Solid receivers. A good "O" line. A defense that has been getting turnovers and getting better each week. All this, and we were facing a team that has struggled to score points and get any offense going this year. Yet this game, going into the 4th quarter, we were in real danger of giving Georgetown a way back into it.

Ultimately, we did put the hammer down. Paul Fabre forced the fumble, and Julian Austin grabbed it. Sedale led the change for the TD drive, and Marques Thompson iced it with 2 TDs. But we're not focusing on being "possessed with excellence" in a 28-3 win. We're focusing on the "potential pains of elimination" at the end of that 3rd quarter, trying very hard to give Georgetown a chance.

It wasn't what I wanted to see. As a long-time Lehigh fan, I wanted to see fewer mistakes, less hubris, less "we're going to show up and win without even playing, and we're going to jaw at the Hoyas even though we're 1-3 just like they are". 10 penalties for 81 yards were inexusable, especially since the miscues negated countless good returns and runs. 5-of-12 on 3rd down conversions? Unacceptable. Does that sound like a team that has the right to jaw at anyone?

I would hope that the Yale game next week - a team that beat Lafayette and is 3-1 on the year with their only loss to a nationally-ranked opponent - wouldn't see a repeat of the jawing and sloppy play of last week. Normally I'd say about the Yale game that it would be nice to keep up the winning ways, or to see a good game without a slipup. Now, it becomes crucial to win this game against yet another quality opponent and keep the winning ways coming. I think the psychic factor of beating Yale, who is 3-1 and also beat that college in Easton, could be huge.

I think what we all wanted Lehigh to do this week was learn how to win. After this week, despite the fact that we came away with the victory, it's clear this Mountain Hawk team hasn't learned that yet. Hopefully they will very soon. Hopefuly they'll learn to put teams away early and not kill themselves with penalties and mistakes. But Yale won't be an easy time or place to learn. If we go into the Yale game with the attitude that this game doesn't matter, or that we're not going to play 60 minutes of football, we'll be 2-4 with more questions than ever about the mettle of this team.

Hopefully this Lehigh team will understand that.

In the meantime, like Aristotle says, we Lehigh fans will have to remain "pained with the thought of elimination" -- for at least one more week.

Comments

Anonymous said…
yea i doubt lehigh wins this game. There is one thing that makes me think we have a chance. They have a great running back who is the focus of their offense. I like our chances v. a great Rb rather than a great Qb. Lehigh might be able to stop him and keep this game low scoring. I doubt it though. Sedale will most likely have to outscore another team. 2-4 wow that doesnt seem right at all. Well Lehigh isnt the only other great powerhouse that sucks this year, georgia southern is 2-3 i think.
Anonymous said…
Last poster has jerk of the year all locked up! Way to go jerko!

Popular posts from this blog

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League. W

UMass 21, Lafayette 14, halftime

Are you watching this game? UMass had this game under control until about 3 minutes in the second quarter, and then got an interception, converted for a TD. Then the Leopards forced a fumble off the return, and then converted THAT for a TD, making this a game. It's on CN8. You really should be watching this.

Examining A Figure Skating Rivalry: Tonya and Nancy

It must be very hard for a millennial to understand the fuss around the Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding figure skating scandal in the run-up to the 1994 Olympics. If you're of a certain age, though - whether you're a figure skating fan or not, and I am decidedly no fan of figure skating - the Shakespearean story of Harding and Kerrigan still engages, and still grabs peoples' attention, twenty years later. Why, though?  Why, twenty years later, in a sport I care little, does the story still grab me?  Why did I spend time out of my life watching dueling NBC and ESPN documentaries on the subject, and Google multiple stories about Jeff Gilooly , idiot "bodyguards", and the whole sordid affair? I think it's because the story, even twenty years later, is like opium. The addictive story, even now, has everything.  Everything.  The woman that fought for everything, perhaps crossing over to the dark side to get her chance at Olypic Gold, vs. the woman who