Skip to main content

Lehigh 28, Holy Cross 14, final

You can't put into words what this win should mean to this team.

After all the uncertainty early in the year; after losing two straight bad-weather games; after all those bad snaps and fumbles in those two games; this game proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is a different team.

Turnovers: 0.

Interceptions against Holy Cross: 2.

Penalties: 0. (OK, well I don't know that, but it seems like we didn't have many penalties at all.)

The fact that this Lehigh team has finally got some redemption for those two bad-weather losses has to be the story of this game. No more critical miscues. No more bad snaps. Lehigh did exactly what they needed to do to exorcise those bad-weather ghosts: they played nearly mistake-free ball and blew the other team away at the line of scrimmage. That spells win.

The defense may have given up some yardage, especially at the end, but they came up with two huge stops at the goal line which left the Crusaders with 0 points. Every man on the defense played a big role, but big #77, NT Eric Rakus, was clearly "the man" for much of the game, getting in QB Dominc Randolph's face, deflecting passes, and also doing great in pass coverage too.

On offense, the "O" line did a fantastic job dominating the Crusaders up front in a way I don't think I've ever seen a Lehigh line do. In the "Air Lehigh" days, we used to spread the offense and do some little blocking underneath. Now, we're getting big push to get big yards. If we can continue to get better as the weeks go on... we may just have a shot at this thing.

The win wasn't perfect. We got very very lucky that an onside kick, with 5:00 to play in the game had an "offside" call that judging by the replay sure didn't look offsides to me. There were still those few periods of mental lapse that still need to be looked at.

But overall, this was a great, inspiring game for Lehigh fans. We survive. Next up: Colgate, who will be coming into Goodman next week desperate not to get that second league loss. It won't be easy. But this team feels like it's hitting its stride at the exact right time, with the ghosts of uncertainty diminishing into the mist at Fitton.

Comments

Anonymous said…
`Kudos to the WEBMASTER. His analysis was spot on. Mine was not.

LU 76
Anonymous said…
Lehigh played a dominating game today against a solid team. Randolph is the real deal. While he got his yards in the second half, the defense made some big plays and played smart defense after the TD pass in the first half. I wish Coen would have not played it so conservatively on offense in the second half, but he apparently took the position that LU would not lose the game by being too aggressive and force HC to beat us - didn't happen. Good game plan and good execution.
Given the conditions, the recent mud game performance, this game was as mistake-free as one could hope for. LFN's analysis was spot on. LU looks to be hitting its stride at the right time.
Anonymous said…
Hey the two touchdown guy was right! Uh-oh wrong team though. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
Anonymous said…
They've looked much better the last two games. Now that they are into the league schedule, let's hope that they have worked out the kinks of a new coaching staff and other distractions and are back in their historical groove.

Remember that their four losses were all close, to good teams.

Now they have to continue to improve execution against Colgate on Saturday. This won't be easy, but Colgate will be up against the wall after losing so badly on Saturday AT HOME against Lafayette. One must be wary of desperate Raiders.

I still don't expect any of these teams to go undefeated in the league.

And again, it's looking like LU v. LC will decide it all.
Anonymous said…
Thumbs up from Greenville, SC. Nice to see the Hawks playing well. Like most Furman fans, I have always respected Lehigh as an outstanding school with an outstanding football tradition. Our playoff matchup a few years back was college football at its best: scholar-athletes playing for the love of it on the field and alumni enjoying some intelligent and respectful banter in the stands.

I wish FU and Lehigh could arrange a home and home.

Anyway, good luck on the remainder of your schedule.

Popular posts from this blog

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League....

UMass 21, Lafayette 14, halftime

Are you watching this game? UMass had this game under control until about 3 minutes in the second quarter, and then got an interception, converted for a TD. Then the Leopards forced a fumble off the return, and then converted THAT for a TD, making this a game. It's on CN8. You really should be watching this.

Examining A Figure Skating Rivalry: Tonya and Nancy

It must be very hard for a millennial to understand the fuss around the Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding figure skating scandal in the run-up to the 1994 Olympics. If you're of a certain age, though - whether you're a figure skating fan or not, and I am decidedly no fan of figure skating - the Shakespearean story of Harding and Kerrigan still engages, and still grabs peoples' attention, twenty years later. Why, though?  Why, twenty years later, in a sport I care little, does the story still grab me?  Why did I spend time out of my life watching dueling NBC and ESPN documentaries on the subject, and Google multiple stories about Jeff Gilooly , idiot "bodyguards", and the whole sordid affair? I think it's because the story, even twenty years later, is like opium. The addictive story, even now, has everything.  Everything.  The woman that fought for everything, perhaps crossing over to the dark side to get her chance at Olypic Gold, vs. the woman who...