Skip to main content

I-AA Championship Game Tomorrow

It's finally here. Tomorrow, in Chattanooga, TN, Appalachian State will play Northern Iowa to determine the true champion of I-AA. It's determined on the field, not by a bunch of sportswriters or computer formulas.

Of the 16 teams in the I-AA playoffs, you could make an argument that the two most consistent and deep teams made the championship. Both have survived injuries to their QBs to make it here. Both have won with a combination of above-average offenses and defenses - they are teams with few, if any, huge weaknesses.

If there's a talent advantage, it could marginally go to Appalachian State, since they place three Sports Network first and second team All-Americans to Northern Iowa's zero. But the road to Chattanooga has been littered with teams with supposedly more talent than the Panthers. Eastern Washington learned in the 1st round that it would take more than QB Erik Meyer and WR Eric Kimble to win the game. New Hampshire learned in the quarterfinals that it would take more than QB Ricky Santos and WR David Ball to beat them. And Texas State learned that it takes a whole lot more than superstar QB Barrick Nealy to win it all for them in OT. The Panthers have chewed up and spit out "more talented" teams by being solid everywhere, and challenging their opponents as an entire team.

That's not to say that Appalachian St. hasn't also been tested. In the first round, Lafayette gave them all they could handle before finally taking care of business in the 4th quarter. Southern Illinois couldn't get by the tough Mountaineer defense, but Furman came right at them. With App St.'s all-star QB Richie Williams going down with an injury, backup QB Trey Elder came off the bench and led the Mountaineers to the winning score. The Furman game in particular showed that this team has the will to withstand some adversity as well.

It's looking like Richie Williams will start in the championship game, which is great for him and I-AA football in general. With a great matchup like this one tomorrow, you don't want to see any injuries marring the final result. We will truly know tomorrow who the best team will be in all of I-AA.

A very quick tale of the tape:

QBs: App St. features Richie Williams, a multifaceted star that can kill you with his arm or his legs in the Donovan McNabb mold. UNI's Eric Sanders is more of a pure pocket passer, more like a Danny Wuerffel style. When you compare these guy's pros and cons, they all cancel each other out. Advantage: Even.

RBs: ASU's Kevin Richardson is a prime-time performer, who has speed to the outside, but can also run off-tackle when he needs to. UNI's David Horne is a great back, but doesn't appear to bring quite the same explosiveness to the table. Advantage: ASU.

WRs: Both teams spread the ball around an awful lot, but UNI's trio of Hunter, Surrency and Goodwin have produced more - especially in the clutch in playoff time. Advantage: UNI.

"O" Line: The Panthers get the edge. In time of possession and in 3rd down conversions, they're among the best in I-AA, and it's won them games in the playofff. Advantage: UNI.

"D" Line: ASU's defensive ends are for real. ESPN2's commenators, even though they repeated it ad nauseum, do have it right. These guys are good, and you have to account for them always. Advantage: ASU.

LBs: The Panthers have the edge, with a pair of solid tacklers in Darin Heideman and Brett Koebke. The LB crew, with their heady interception of Nealy in overtime in Texas, is one huge reason why they're here. Advantage: UNI.

DBs: UNI has some greatly talented DBs in Tanner Varner and Dre Dokes, but ASU's duo of Corey Lynch and Jeremy Wiggins are slightly better. Both of these defensive backfields are among the elite of I-AA, but I'm giving a slight edge to ASU. Advantage: ASU.

Special teams: No doubt about it, UNI's special teams have the edge. Kicking, punting and return yardage all favor the Panthers. Advantage: UNI.

Fearless Prediction: This should be everything people are expecting. A close game going down to the wire, with a lot of heart going into every play. I think it will be one for the ages. I think UNI wins with the same formula they've been using in the playoffs. Get to a 2-score lead, control the ball, and be in it at the end. I think UNI does it once again.

UNI 37, App St. 31, OT

Comments

Anonymous said…
I have to disagree with a bit of your assessment.

You use TOP and 3rd down conversions as the measuring stick for O-line. First off, ASU and UNI convereted the exact same percentage of 3rd downs, 46%.

Secondly, in terms of TOP, that favors a UNI attack that is slower paced than ASU. But looking at total scoring (ASU leads that), and yards per game (ASU leads that), it just shows ASU's offense is more powerful and strikes faster.

Moreover, here's one stat you cannot ignore. ASU's O-line has given up 9 sacks all season. UNI, 33! That's a big number to ignore there.

Also, ASU is much more opportunistic on defense. ASU has a +10 turnover margin, UNI +3. ASU gives up 334 yards a game on defense. UNI gives up 381. ASU's defense allows 40% conversion on third down, UNI 44%. ASU's scoring defense allows 19.0 ppg. UNI, 24.0.

If we're going to do a prediction based off of numbers, no combination of numbers points to a UNI win here. I'm not saying you should not pick UNI, but it seems to me the basis of judgement was not fully done.
Anonymous said…
Lafayette was tied going into the 4th quarter with the eventual national champs. I don't want to hear any more stuff from Lehigh people about Lafayette not being worthy.
Anonymous said…
Lafayette was not worthy. Luckiest team ever. They suck. No go away.
Anonymous said…
Lehigh was a lot closer to beating JMU last year than Lafayette was to beating ASU this year. Lafayette got lucky and Lehigh got unlucky.
Anonymous said…
Lehigh played a HOME game last year vs. JMU, which was a travesty itself, and they couldn't beat JMU.
Not to say that Lehigh shouldn't have made the playoffs last year, I think they should have, but getting a home game as an at large team while the league champ got to go on the road? Give me a break.
Say what you want about being lucky this year, last year Lehigh got smoked and then got rewarded for it. They don't give home games for wild card teams in the NFL and that's based purely on record, not on who is the 'best' team.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS

By now you've seen the results.  In 2018, the Ivy League has taken the FCS by storm. Perhaps it was Penn's 30-10 defeat of Lehigh a couple of weeks ago .  Or maybe it was Princeton's 50-9 drubbing of another team that made the FCS Playoffs last year, Monmouth.  Or maybe it was Yale's shockingly dominant 35-14 win over nationally-ranked Maine last weekend. The Ivy League has gone an astounding 12-4 so far in out-of-conference play, many of those wins coming against the Patriot League. But it's not just against the Patriot League where the Ivy League has excelled.  Every Ivy League school has at least one out-of-conference victory, which is remarkable since it is only three games into their football season.  The four losses - Rhode Island over Harvard, Holy Cross over Yale, Delaware over Cornell, and Cal Poly over Brown - were either close losses that could have gone either way or expected blowouts of teams picked to be at the bottom of the Ivy League. W

UMass 21, Lafayette 14, halftime

Are you watching this game? UMass had this game under control until about 3 minutes in the second quarter, and then got an interception, converted for a TD. Then the Leopards forced a fumble off the return, and then converted THAT for a TD, making this a game. It's on CN8. You really should be watching this.

Examining A Figure Skating Rivalry: Tonya and Nancy

It must be very hard for a millennial to understand the fuss around the Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding figure skating scandal in the run-up to the 1994 Olympics. If you're of a certain age, though - whether you're a figure skating fan or not, and I am decidedly no fan of figure skating - the Shakespearean story of Harding and Kerrigan still engages, and still grabs peoples' attention, twenty years later. Why, though?  Why, twenty years later, in a sport I care little, does the story still grab me?  Why did I spend time out of my life watching dueling NBC and ESPN documentaries on the subject, and Google multiple stories about Jeff Gilooly , idiot "bodyguards", and the whole sordid affair? I think it's because the story, even twenty years later, is like opium. The addictive story, even now, has everything.  Everything.  The woman that fought for everything, perhaps crossing over to the dark side to get her chance at Olypic Gold, vs. the woman who